Fitness Magazines: Do They Make Us Feel Better or Worse About Ourselves?

(This is cross-posted at BlogHer.)

Through the years, I’ve had subscriptions to many of the major women’s fashion magazines at some time or another: Cosmopolitan. Marie Claire. In Style. Glamour. In the past year or so I’ve switched to fitness-related magazines instead: Shape. Fitness. Oxygen. Women’s Health.

My observation: fashion magazines tend to be criticized for showcasing 80-lb. models wearing ridiculously expensive gowns (among other things), but fitness magazines can display unrealistic body types, too. (I’m not saying this is their fault — they choose cover models with washboard abs because they want an alluring picture to pique consumers’ interest at the supermarket checkout aisle. It’s the same reason why celebrities tend to grace the covers of fashion magazines way more often than actual models do.)

As much as I wish these images didn’t affect me, I still sometimes catch myself being hyper-aware of women’s bodies in fitness magazines. And I’m not saying this is always a bad thing. If you see a woman burst through the tape at the finish line of a marathon? Or hoist a heavy weight? Or complete a pull-up (something I’d very much like to be able to do myself)? Now those are images to look up to.

The thing is, I really like the idea of fitness magazines. I like their focus on healthy living, smart eating choices, lifestyle success stories, and new workout ideas. But I also think they can be just as detrimental as their fashion-focused counterparts, and that’s because there are so many women who strive to look like fitness models, to the detriment of the actual “healthy” part. If you’re stick-thin because you do a lot of cardio, but completely skip the weight training? If you eat healthy foods but don’t eat enough to support a healthy BMI? Can you really say you’re doing what’s best for your body?

I’m not trying to preach. It’s just that I understand how easy it is to fall into the trap of trying to look like someone you’re not. I’ll be the first to admit that I spent too many years focused on the numbers on the scale, rather than how I felt physically.

I’m in a much better state, both mentally and physically, than I once was. But even as my thoughts evolve away from, “I want to look like her!” to thinking instead, “I want to see my abs because I know I have a strong core and I’ve worked HARD for that definition,” it’s still possible to get sucked back into the Old Way of Thinking. And when I see photos of impossibly flat abs, or stick-thin thighs, that doesn’t help.

What’s the solution? In my case, as cheesy as this may sound, my internal rule is that I have to follow up any negative thoughts with something positive. For example, as I was writing this post last night, I received the July issue of Oxygen magazine in the mail. (I do like Oxygen better than some of the other fitness magazines out there — they tend to feature women with actual muscles, and visibly strong/fit bodies, rather than women who look like they only eat lettuce.)

I looked at the cover. “Her abs!” I noted immediately. (I tend to get jealous over a nice set of defined abdominals.)

My immediate follow-up to that was, “You just went to the gym and did a mean leg workout. You go, girl!”

And, no, of course that doesn’t mean I can delude myself into thinking I suddenly have a Rock Star Body like this particular cover model. But you know what? You have to be kind to your body, and be thankful for what you do like about it, and all the things you’re able to accomplish. If the magazine really bothered me so much that it made me feel like crap whenever I looked at it? I’d throw it away. Because my sanity is way more important.

Noel Figart says she has “something of a love/hate relationship with fitness literature.”

On the one hand I like to look for information.

On the other? It can be discouraging.

When I see articles about how someone’s life has become so much better since they got thin and look great in a bikini I want to scream, “You’re missing the point!” I mean…of course I want to be found attractive. But ya know, that’s a lot of work to go to get approbation from the outside. And the idea of finding life validation in terms of how sexy I’m seen is kinda scary to me, because it puts my life worth in someone else’s hands. No thanks. See, when I work out, I do it to be stronger. Would I like to look hot in a bikini? Sure. But honestly that’s years away if it ever happens and isn’t much of a motivator to get my ass into the pool or a bar loaded across my shoulders. At this stage it’s the energy to do my day. It’s having physical options.

When LeAnn Rimes was on the cover of Fitness magazine, the blogger at Bliss and Beauty walked by a magazine rack with her husband and had the following exchange:

H[usband]: What! Is that LeAnn Rimes? Didn’t she used to be chubby. Well, I don’t mean chubby, just not that thin.

Me: She was “softer” when she was younger.

H[usband]: She looks really different.

Me: I read [she] took up yoga.

And that was the end of the conversation. Not significant. But if I was “on,” I would have pointed out that of course she looks different. It’s called perfect lighting, hair and make-up experts, body tape, and, the biggie, photoshop. I guess we can’t be advocating all the time.

Leslie at The Weighting Game gives “Reason #15,913 [Why] I love my husband.”

Shape Magazine arrived in the mail a few days ago and, upon spying Ali Larter on the cover in a bikini, he pointed to the impossibly long vertical line bisecting her chest and torso and said, “She is SO airbrushed! How can people think that’s real?”

God, I adore him.

When actress Angie Harmon was on the cover of Shape magazine last year, she said she never goes to a gym. Stephanie from Back in Skinny Jeans thought it was irresponsible for a fitness magazine to convey that message.

[T]he byline reads, “Angie Harmon How she got this body. No gym. No Trainer.” In the magazine article, Angie says she keeps her great shape through weekend activities like swimming, hiking, and bike rides with her two girls and hubbie Jason Seaborn. [...]

[F]or her to say that she stays this skinny with just fun family activities is kinda fantasy land, and not really a good article for Shape magazine. I mean isn’t the whole point of Shape to help us stay fit and healthy through exercise, food, and well being[?]

I think Angie just has a really high metabolism and is one of those ladies who is just naturally on the thin side. Again, I don’t know her personally and for all we know she doesn’t eat much. When actresses say they stay magazine cover thin by not working out I tend to call shenanigans.

Erica Bartle (nee Holburn) helped put together a “body special” for a magazine last year, and had this to say about her experience.

Yes, women’s magazines make health and nutritional information accessible for women who really need it — many get encouraging letters from readers who have been inspired to take control of their health and lose weight. But there also needs to be a message about weight loss not being the key to happiness. Show me a skinny, carb-deprived woman who’s smiling and I’ll give you a hundred bucks (Nicole, Mary-Kate et. al. could barely muster the energy for a smile, surviving as they do/did on Starbucks coffee).

Taylor Ryan at Real Women Lift says “Celebrities and Their Workout Secrets Are Nothing But Bologna.”

Apparently Beyonce is able to maintain her bootylicious body because she resist[s] cravings for southern food. [...] I can guarantee you that Beyonce does a bit more than just say No to fried chicken and Mac & Cheese. I pray that people do not really look to the stars for fitness advice because it is very doubtful that…useful tips and programs are going to be given to get the body you want.

I am not saying that these stars do not have a great diet and exercise program but the tips that are often given or their claims for why they look the way they do are often skewed. Real muscle and leanness comes from a proper fitness and diet plan. I promise it is not going to happen if you walk your dog around the block each day for your sole exercise or if you pass on the collards.

Fitness model Jamie Eason did an interview with Fat Fighter TV. She was asked, “How hard is it to look that good?!!” Her response:

[Jamie]: Unfortunately, it’s not easy! If it were, everyone would look fit all the time. People need to realize, women especially, that what you see in magazines is not only enhanced with Photoshop, but many models are photographed around contest time or the women have trained specifically for the shoot. I will be the first to admit that even with my best efforts, stress and hormones alone, will add 8 to 10 pounds of water weight that are sometimes unavoidable before a shoot. It is very difficult to achieve the perfect look we see in magazines, and nearly impossible to maintain it for any length of time. Age, hormones and genetics are all big factors.

An upside to all this? Technology. Blogs. The freedom we have to write whatever we want — both good and bad — about our bodies and how we may feel about them at any particular time. BlogHer co-founder Lisa Stone and Contributing Editor Suzanne Reisman were interviewed for an article that appeared in Fitness magazine: Body Confidence 2.0: How Technology Is Changing Women’s Body Image.

Over the past 12 months, a viral movement has begun — a grassroots effort to take back the way women’s bodies are represented in America. “What we are seeing is a backlash to the homogenizing of women’s bodies via airbrushing and digital manipulation,” says Lisa Stone, cofounder of BlogHer.com, a Web site devoted to what women are saying and writing online. “More and more women are realizing the power of the Internet to reach out to other women in affirmation of what our bodies really look like. We see that we can turn the tables on how technology is used in the larger conversation about body image.” [...]

In the past five years, we have shifted from a society that uses the Internet to receive factual information to one that uses the Web to share anecdotal advice — and women are leading the charge. “Women are the ‘connectors’ in our communities,” says Stone. “The Internet is another forum for doing that.”

Do fitness magazines affect you, either positively or negatively? If you read them, which one is your favorite?

Related Reading:

Kelly at Fitness Fixation has an issue with magazines that make women look too perfect (doesn’t everybody sweat when they work out?). She dislikes all the “preachy, uptight fitness advice I find so appalling in most women’s magazines” and she wants to start a “blog campaign for sweaty models who don’t smile when they exercise.”

Ace Fitness: Fitness Magazines and Image Disorders

Zen Habits: 17 Fitness Truths To Get You In Great Shape. (#13 is “Don’t compare yourself to magazine models.”)

21 Comments



  1. I do read Fitness (well, I thumb through the magazine while I’m getting my biweekly pedicure).

    I find it’s really hard for me to relate to the women on the cover of Fitness magazines. I’m naturally curvy which in most fitness magazines that look doesn’t reign supreme. Also, Women of Color aren’t recognized in a lot of the fitness magazines and even though we are all female, I would like to be able to chart the success of someone similar to me from time to time. I admit that some of my skewed body image issues stem from always glancing at magazine covers (fitness and otherwise) and seeing people who don’t represent me or where I come from. It made it hard to identify.

    I want to focus more on accepting my body and realizing there are some things I won’t be able to change. I don’t necessarily want to “look” like someone else or have legs, abs like them.

    I want to see real people dealing with weight. I enjoy the progress segments more than hearing how the hottest actress/model stays thin. Not realistic for my aspirations!

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 9:51 am #
  2. Cheers for the post! I have been struggling with realistic expectations for my body since I began working out again. While I don’t like how many women struggle with this, it’s very nice to know I am not alone.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:29 am #
  3. I think you’re right. While I love my Health subscription and how overall, it has been helpful in my health & fitness journey, there are ways that I’ve absorbed subtle not-so-healthy messages about body image from the pictures.

    I actually really love seeing photos of REAL life people…non-models who are a little pudgier, and a little less put together. It’s more inspiring to me to know that other normal women are in the same boat as I am.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 10:54 am #
  4. I love your rule about following up any negative thoughts with a positive thought, Zandria, that is a great philosophy to have!

    The only magazines that I read regularly are Triathlon/Triathlete and most of the people in them are actual Traithletes who spend their lives working out. I tend to ogle their gear (like their ridiculously expensive bikes/wetsuits) instead of their rock hard bodies!

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:19 am #
  5. Molly: You know, that’s a really good point about the focus of certain magazines. “Fitness” magazines tend to focus on our bodies and how to make them LOOK better, while “sports” magazines (like those geared towards triathletes, bikers, etc.) focus more on the ABILITIES of the people themselves — and their gear. :)

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:24 am #
  6. This is an excellent post. Thank you so much for it.

    I read Runner’s World, and sometimes Women’s Health. I completely agree with you – a picture of a woman crossing the finish line of a marathon is a much STRONGER image than those that we currently see.

    PS – I started researching swimming classes… :)

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 11:40 am #
  7. I love Runner’s World as well–I’ve never really bought any of the other fitness magazines. I think that’s because I hate lifting weights, and I’m pretty sure that fitness magazines would probably tell me to lift. I do really hate when some obviously fit and toned celeb claims to look that way from walking the dog. Come on! Wouldn’t it be better to say with pride, “I put in a lot of hard work in the gym and it pays off”?

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:19 pm #
  8. It’s so funny that you posted an article about magazines this morning. I did too except in mine I was just frustrated at the loads of quick fix diet pill ads they have. Some magazines can really take the focus away from fitness and nutrition and place it on these diet pills–pretty crazy and can be very discouraging when they try to tell us that the model became chiseled in 6 weeks working only 30 minutes 3 days a week. Great post–thanks!!

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 12:58 pm #
  9. I love fitness magazine. I agree that the person on the cover is probably something I’ll never look like, but the pros outweigh (no pun intented) the cons. All it does it just kind of keeps me motivated. What bugs me though about things like the self challenge is they target people who have little or no fitness level, so if i followed it i would actually be going backwards in my fitness routine. anyway, like i said, it does keep me motivated. it would be great if the airbrushing did stop going to such extremes though.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:12 pm #
  10. I pretty much avoid all women’s magazines these days. Once in a while I’ll pick up a fitness magazine, but I’m usually dissappoint. It’s just the same stuff repeated over and over again so why waste the money.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 1:31 pm #
  11. Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:15 pm #
  12. I’m a total sucker for fitness magazines. I’ll read them pretty often. Most of the time I’ll be partly disgusted with it, but its one of those guilty pleasures, I guess. I enjoy reading those kinds of things and I think the main thing is to just not take it too much to heart!

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 2:23 pm #
  13. Great post! I actually tried to ban fitness magazines in my house. However my bestfriend got me a subscription for Christmas. As soon as its over, then I’m really done with them. I mean, how many different ways can they have the “Lose 5 pounds in a week” article.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 3:01 pm #
  14. wow – great job gathering so much info together here! I echo your sentiment that it can be both uplifting as well as discouraging. I amke it a point to NOT read magazines that portray overly thin models (ie most beauty mags) and stick with the fitness ones which make me feel happy about being a strong woman…even if I don’t have a washboard tummy.

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 4:10 pm #
  15. (blows kisses at WG who so often says what Im feeling only BETTER)

    Im gonna go out on a limb here

    part devils advocate and part how I really feel.

    THEY DONT IMPACT ME EITHER WAY.

    I read them. but with the same cynical eye as I read STAR MAG, THE NYT, or a James Frey novel.

    I gather the tips which apply to me (read: not the make up but the how to pack more cr** in your gym bag type stuff) laugh AT the insanity of it (how these women stay thin and eat only junkfood and “just look this way. Im lucky!!”) and move on.

    Im not sure why they dont make me feel sh**** about myself—even when I had weight I needed to lose—and if I can ever figure it out Im gonna pass it on to my daughter.

    thanks Z for the GREAT conglomeration o’info!

    Posted May 13, 2008 at 5:44 pm #
  16. Great post, Zan! I don’t know if my viewpoint will help or not, but the one thing I have noticed about fitness magazines that show IMPOSSIBLY ripped people on their covers (‘impossibly’ refering to air-brushing or steroid abusers or people who are paid fitness models, and so can devote their entire day to working on their body, through diet and exercise) is that–well, first I can’t imagine wanting to look like one of those people, but second, I believe that the men I know are not looking at the women in these magazines thinking that they want to be with somebody who looked that ripped. I do not find the female models in these magazines attractive, and I think many men do not either; I think it is mainly women noticing these nearly impossible-to-obtain figures…I think these magazines are more about guilt, and fantasy than they are about promoting healthy lifestyles, and promoting what the world really is all about, when it comes to attraction. I soo wish that women would not look at these stupid magazines and feel inferior, or undesirable. I look at the butt-head men on these covers and laugh…they soo-define themselves by how taut their bellies are, and how thick their chests are. And I know it’s easier for me, because men are held, generally, to lower standards of attraction than are women, in our stupid society, but also, I mean really, who the hell would want to look like one of these muscle-rich, fitness-osbsessed people? I wish women would not let corporate America decide for them how they should look, or when they should feel inferior, and why they are inadequate. So, please know that not everyone wants a washboard-stomach model as a mate…and please, do not let these dumb magazines help to establish your sense of worth…I think I didn’t say that all exactly how I heard it in my thoughts, but I hope it made some sense, CR

    Another Chris
    Posted May 13, 2008 at 8:30 pm #
  17. I was actually just talking about this issue, regarding a section of Cosmo that I read today.
    It was on facts you don’t know about Kristen Bell..
    One of the facts was that she “believes in breakfast after every meal, including breakfast.”
    I find reading things like that frustrating.. It is promoting a negative body image to those who cannot eat DESSERT AFTER EVERY MEAL.. Which should be everyone, no?
    And honestly, Kristen Bell does not eat dessert three times a day.
    The celebrities that claim their “rock hard abs” come from walking their dogs on weekends are annoying. And liars.

    Posted May 14, 2008 at 12:09 am #
  18. Thanks for mentioning BlogHer! I must say, though, that when I picked up a copy of Fitness to read that article, I was shocked that many of the women they depicted are not “perfect.” (Nor were they all in their 20s.) It seemed like a good start to showing the wider range of women as we actually appear in real life. A few weeks later, I looked at my friend’s Glamour magazine and was also surprised to see different types of women in it. Maybe one day, magazines will realize that they don’t need to airbrush the living daylights out of their cover models, too. Let’s keep the pressure up to show more diversity!

    Posted May 14, 2008 at 8:58 am #
  19. i haven’t found any women’s fitness magazines that i like in a long time. even to the extent that they do have good information, it’s so repetitive — i found that i was basically reading the same information over and over.

    i generally like to read “discipline-specific” magazines (for lack of a better term) like “Running” and “Outside” — although i’m not currently a runner or an outdoor sports person, i find that these kinds of magazines have the general fitness-related articles i’m interested in. like what’s the best heartrate monitor and why i should incorporate anaerobic intervals into my workouts… stuff like that.

    and another upside is that these kinds of magazines don’t tend to have a lot of “cheesecake” type photos highlighting model’s bodies.

    "classic" jen
    Posted May 14, 2008 at 4:38 pm #
  20. I really enjoyed your article Zan! Enough said :)

    Elissa
    Posted May 15, 2008 at 10:27 am #
  21. What’s worse is fashion magazines that ask us to look at what we hate about our bodies in order to find the best clothes. I just wrote a post about how mad I got when I read InStyle’s recent Shape Your Style issue: http://www.jivafit.com/2008/05/15/stop-hating-and-start-loving-your-body/
    The credit I can give to fitness magas is that they will on occasion print a fashion story that tells us how to show off our favorite body parts, open back dresses for strong backs, sleeveless tops if you love your arms and so on.

    Posted May 15, 2008 at 12:30 pm #

One Trackback

  1. By Zandria.us » Don’t End on a Negative on May 26, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    [...] I said last week: In my case, my internal rule is that I have to follow up any negative thoughts with something [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*